<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rest of the story on LifeLock</title>
	<link>http://creditcardvc.com/2007/rest-of-the-story-on-lifelock/</link>
	<description>Site for business owners who are not looking for VC.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 01:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Jules Carney</title>
		<link>http://creditcardvc.com/2007/rest-of-the-story-on-lifelock/#comment-5963</link>
		<author>Jules Carney</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 05:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://creditcardvc.com/2007/rest-of-the-story-on-lifelock/#comment-5963</guid>
		<description>I have to say, you did a really nice job on explaining something that can be really tricky at times. There are times that I struggle with wrapping my head around topics like the this, thank you for summing it up well. 

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say, you did a really nice job on explaining something that can be really tricky at times. There are times that I struggle with wrapping my head around topics like the this, thank you for summing it up well. </p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ray stern</title>
		<link>http://creditcardvc.com/2007/rest-of-the-story-on-lifelock/#comment-2334</link>
		<author>ray stern</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 18:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://creditcardvc.com/2007/rest-of-the-story-on-lifelock/#comment-2334</guid>
		<description>Go to Arrington's site and read what I posted there. 

I'm not the one trying to make a case of connections between my article and the credit agencies. You are. And you've failed to make that case, in part because you didn't bother to e-mail me before you wrote your piece. I'm not being arrogant -- I'm being frustrated that bloggers like you don't choose to research what you write.

ray</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go to Arrington&#8217;s site and read what I posted there. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not the one trying to make a case of connections between my article and the credit agencies. You are. And you&#8217;ve failed to make that case, in part because you didn&#8217;t bother to e-mail me before you wrote your piece. I&#8217;m not being arrogant &#8212; I&#8217;m being frustrated that bloggers like you don&#8217;t choose to research what you write.</p>
<p>ray</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://creditcardvc.com/2007/rest-of-the-story-on-lifelock/#comment-2333</link>
		<author>Scott</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 16:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://creditcardvc.com/2007/rest-of-the-story-on-lifelock/#comment-2333</guid>
		<description>Ray,

I was a reporter for a dozen years, including a couple at a New Times property. If you think my post, or Arrington's, has some problem, let us know.

Being arrogant and trying to make a distinction between bloggers and reporters doesn't help make your case, making your case does. Let's hear it. 

If you need help getting started, here's one way you could do it: Publish somewhere (in print or here if you can lower yourself to write for a blog) the story behind the story. Tell us about who first contacted you about the story. Did you get a package of PDFs anonymously? Make the case that you are sure that no credit agency shill was behind your story.

Nobody is trying to say Maynard is a saint. That said, Arrington raised some legitimate questions about the motivation of whoever leaked that story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ray,</p>
<p>I was a reporter for a dozen years, including a couple at a New Times property. If you think my post, or Arrington&#8217;s, has some problem, let us know.</p>
<p>Being arrogant and trying to make a distinction between bloggers and reporters doesn&#8217;t help make your case, making your case does. Let&#8217;s hear it. </p>
<p>If you need help getting started, here&#8217;s one way you could do it: Publish somewhere (in print or here if you can lower yourself to write for a blog) the story behind the story. Tell us about who first contacted you about the story. Did you get a package of PDFs anonymously? Make the case that you are sure that no credit agency shill was behind your story.</p>
<p>Nobody is trying to say Maynard is a saint. That said, Arrington raised some legitimate questions about the motivation of whoever leaked that story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ray stern</title>
		<link>http://creditcardvc.com/2007/rest-of-the-story-on-lifelock/#comment-2332</link>
		<author>ray stern</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 16:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://creditcardvc.com/2007/rest-of-the-story-on-lifelock/#comment-2332</guid>
		<description>That's funny. I never received an e-mail from Credit Card VC or Arrington before they wrote this "rest of the story nonsense." Bloggers aren't reporters, that's for sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s funny. I never received an e-mail from Credit Card VC or Arrington before they wrote this &#8220;rest of the story nonsense.&#8221; Bloggers aren&#8217;t reporters, that&#8217;s for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://creditcardvc.com/2007/rest-of-the-story-on-lifelock/#comment-2330</link>
		<author>Pat Mitchell</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 15:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://creditcardvc.com/2007/rest-of-the-story-on-lifelock/#comment-2330</guid>
		<description>It's interesting to speculate as to who helped pull these facts about the fraudulent past of Maynard and LifeLock together, but in the end, it doesn't matter. It's likely that a lot of people realized what liars and crooks these guys are and spilled the beans. Whether you think Maynard's bankruptcies are relevant is your own opinion, but when a man defrauds lenders and legitimate businesses, uses his father's identity and is then held up as a victim by his company and investors who claim to know the truth, that casts a shadow on the entire company not just the founder, who incidently, still works for them as a consultant.  LifeLock has no credibility. They are just a marketing scam. When I investigated options to protect myself, my first consideration was reputatation. When I learned that RelyData (www.relydata.com) was the only company recommended by the credit bureaus, that told me a lot, and I'd found a solution provider.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s interesting to speculate as to who helped pull these facts about the fraudulent past of Maynard and LifeLock together, but in the end, it doesn&#8217;t matter. It&#8217;s likely that a lot of people realized what liars and crooks these guys are and spilled the beans. Whether you think Maynard&#8217;s bankruptcies are relevant is your own opinion, but when a man defrauds lenders and legitimate businesses, uses his father&#8217;s identity and is then held up as a victim by his company and investors who claim to know the truth, that casts a shadow on the entire company not just the founder, who incidently, still works for them as a consultant.  LifeLock has no credibility. They are just a marketing scam. When I investigated options to protect myself, my first consideration was reputatation. When I learned that RelyData (www.relydata.com) was the only company recommended by the credit bureaus, that told me a lot, and I&#8217;d found a solution provider.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
